By Cameron Erickson, Staff Writer
Glass; the long-awaited Unbreakable and Split sequel crashes into theaters creating divisive opinions among viewers. The big question to be asked: Was it worth the anticipation?
My answer: Eh.
Glass has a lot to like about it but also a lot to not like.
The story as a whole is, yet again, another engaging psychological thriller that pulls you in with its dialogue and masterful cinematography. It holds your hand through a slow-burning second act, turning away the attention of most viewers, but not me.
Bruce Willis reprises his role as David Dunn, “The Overseer,’’ and he does a satisfying job in his character. The key performance is once again James McAvoy as Kevin Wendell Crumb and the 24 different personalities that tag along with him.
McAvoy is outstanding with what he does, and just how quickly he is able to shift between different people. It’s very impressive acting.
Samuel L. Jackson is Mr. Glass or Elijah Price, and he does a fine job. It’s Sam Jackson, what else do you expect?
I was paralyzed by intrigue during the course of the film due to its overwhelming psychology and interesting story. But that all disappears during the third act.
- Night Shyamalan, Glass’ director, can’t keep up with the messy script as he attempts to get fancy with twists and turns that fall short in every way.
Disappointing to say the least. Glass has some great performances and a decently written Act 1 and Act 2, but it fails to stick the landing within its third act, making it an interesting film, but not a cohesive, complete movie that’s supposed to satisfy an 18-year-long trilogy.
Rating: ⅗